Which statement is NOT true regarding Land Court?

Prepare for the Hawaii Real Estate State Exam. Study with comprehensive quizzes featuring flashcards, practice questions, and detailed explanations. Enhance your exam readiness!

The statement regarding Land Court that is not true is that a 20-year trespasser can file an adverse possession action. In the context of Hawaii's Land Court system, adverse possession is not applicable to properties that are registered in Land Court. This is primarily because Land Court provides a method for the accurate and secure registration of title, which confirms ownership and eliminates the need for common law adverse possession claims.

Once a property is registered in Land Court, the title is considered indefeasible, meaning that it cannot be successfully challenged through adverse possession or similar doctrines. This protection is one of the key advantages of the Land Court system, ensuring greater certainty and security in property ownership.

In terms of the other options, liens must indeed be filed to protect any claims against a property in Land Court. Ownership does transfer automatically upon registration, making the declaration of ownership clear and legally binding. Additionally, each registered property in Land Court is assigned a Title Certificate (TCT), which serves as the official record of ownership and related encumbrances. Understanding these concepts helps clarify why the statement regarding a 20-year trespasser is not valid within the Land Court framework.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy